Sports Technology Labs review

Who they are and what we checked

Sports Technology Labs is a Connecticut company founded in 2019 that is a SARMs vendor first and a peptide supplier second. Liquid and powder SARMs make up the main line; a short list of peptides in vials sits beside them. The company publishes its street address, a phone number and an email, names two testing laboratories, and posts certificates without a login, which already places it above many peers on disclosure. The thing to know before ordering a peptide here is that the certificate page shows one report per product, with no lot number, and some of the posted purity figures are below the minimums the company itself states.

We read the homepage, the COA page, the BPC-157 product page and the about page, and we checked Finnrick’s vendor listing. Everything below comes from those pages or from public records.

What the certificate page actually shows

The /coas/ page opens without an account and names MZ Biolabs of Tucson, Arizona, and Colmaric Analyticals LLC as the laboratories. The about page cites credentials belonging to those labs, an MZ Biolabs DEA Schedule III license and GLP status and Colmaric’s ISO-accredited methods, while claiming no certification for the vendor itself, which is an honest distinction that many suppliers blur. HPLC and mass spectrometry are documented as methods. Endotoxin and sterility are not.

The structure of the page is the weak point. Each product shows one “most recent” certificate, with no lot number, so a buyer cannot match the vial they receive to the report they read. Some dates are malformed or stale, for example “09./11/2026” on one report and a RAD-150 report dated 2023. Whether certificates are issued per lot is unknown. Several posted purities also sit below the minimums the site states: DSIP at 90.2 percent, Ligandrol at 97.29 percent and RAD-140 at 97.4 percent. Publishing a result that misses your own standard is more transparent than hiding it, but it means a buyer must read the specific certificate rather than rely on the headline claim, and it raises the question of whether the product was sold anyway. Finnrick, an independent testing aggregator, lists Sports Technology Labs with zero independent tests, so there is no external data to weigh for or against the vendor’s own documents.

The company, the prices and the fine print

The published address is 494 Bridgeport Avenue Suite 101-222, Shelton, CT 06484, with a phone number, 959-333-0983, and an info@ email. A research-use-only disclaimer is present. The Trustpilot profile returned HTTP 451 to our fetcher, so no review figure can be stated. We found no FDA warning letter.

Pricing on the peptide side is premium for this group. BPC-157 5 mg is $54.99, higher than most of the suppliers we track, and free shipping starts at $149. Peptide listings include BPC-157 5 mg, TB-500 5 mg, Ipamorelin 5 mg, Sermorelin 5 mg, SS-31 10 mg and Semax 10 mg. The SARMs side includes Liquid MK-677, Liquid RAD-140, Liquid MK-2866 and Liquid Cardarine. The total product count is not published.

Shipping is from the US, with same-day dispatch available and express options within the country; international shipping is not confirmed in the record, and carriers are not named. Payments are card and Zelle, and the card option gives a buyer a dispute route in addition to the company’s own guarantee.

That guarantee is the longest in our set. A 60-day money-back guarantee applies, with returns and refunds arranged by email within that window. For a buyer weighing a higher price against the lack of a lot number on the certificate, that window is the counterweight: if the product is not what the certificate describes, there is time and a written route to say so. It does not replace a lot-matched document, but it changes who carries the risk while the question is open.

Set against the field, Sports Technology Labs is in the upper half for disclosure and the lower half for certificate structure. Naming two laboratories and opening the certificates to anyone is more than many peptide-first suppliers do, and the about page’s care in attributing credentials to the labs rather than to itself is a small sign of honesty we do not see often. Where it falls short is the one place a careful buyer looks hardest: the link between the document and the vial. One report per product, with no lot number, means that the certificate a buyer reads today may describe a batch that sold out months ago, and the malformed dates on the page make even that harder to judge.

The below-minimum purities deserve a plain reading too. The site states a minimum, posts results beneath it for three products, and continues to list those products. The most charitable reading is that the page is simply out of date. The less charitable reading is that the minimum is a target rather than a gate. The page does not say which, and a buyer should ask before ordering any product whose posted result sits under the company’s own line. The 60-day guarantee is the counterweight to all of this, and it is a real one: no other supplier in our set gives a buyer two months to test, compare and send the product back.

Bottom line

Sports Technology Labs names its laboratories, opens its certificates to anyone, publishes a full set of contact details and backs orders with a 60-day guarantee. What it does not do is tie a certificate to a lot, and some of the certificates it does post show results below its own stated minimums. The BPC-157 price is higher than most peers and the business is built around SARMs. If you want a reachable US company with a long refund window and named labs, and you will read the specific report for your product before relying on it, this is a reasonable place to order. If you need a lot-numbered certificate, you will not get one here.