Licensed Peptides vs Receptor Chem
Licensed Peptides scores higher, 84 to 50. The widest gap is documentation depth. Same formula, same data fields, October 2026.
Factor by factor
| Factor | Licensed Peptides | Receptor Chem | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Testing & certificates | 100 | 40 | Licensed Peptides |
| Documentation depth | 85 | 0 | Licensed Peptides |
| Transparency | 94 | 78 | Licensed Peptides |
| Track record | 27 | 39 | Receptor Chem |
| Catalog | 85 | 64 | Licensed Peptides |
| Pricing | 65 | 70 | Receptor Chem |
| Ordering & service | 80 | 90 | Receptor Chem |
Fact sheets side by side
| Licensed Peptides | Receptor Chem | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 84/100 (#1) | 50/100 (#28) |
| Status | Operating | Operating |
| Based in | Boca Raton, FL | Stanmore, London |
| Founded | Not stated | 2011 |
| Third-party testing | Yes | Limited |
| Laboratories named | Vanguard Laboratory, Ethos Analytics | None named |
| Public certificates | Yes | Yes |
| Lot-specific certificates | Yes | Not verified |
| Formats | vials, nasal, capsules, blends | vials, bulk, blends |
| Catalog size | ≈58 | — |
| BPC-157 5 mg listed price | — | — |
| Free shipping from | $200 | — |
| Payments | card, apple_pay, google_pay | card, wire, crypto |
| Ships internationally | No | Yes |
| Research-use disclaimer | Yes | Not verified |
| FDA warning letter | None found | None found |
Read the full reviews: Licensed Peptides review · Receptor Chem review. Both suppliers sell materials labeled for laboratory research use only.
Both appear on: Suppliers with public certificates of analysis · Suppliers that take card payments · Suppliers with peptide blends.
The factor that separates them
The widest gap is documentation depth (85 vs 0). What that factor measures is explained in how to read a certificate of analysis and lot-level vs sample testing.
Related comparisons
Ascension Peptides vs Licensed Peptides · Licensed Peptides vs Paramount Peptides · Core Peptides vs Licensed Peptides
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Licensed Peptides or Receptor Chem?
On our formula Licensed Peptides scores higher (84 vs 50). The largest gap is in documentation depth (85 vs 0). "Better" depends on what you weight; both fact sheets are on this page.
Do both publish certificates of analysis?
Licensed Peptides: yes. Receptor Chem: yes. Lot-specific certificates — Licensed Peptides: yes; Receptor Chem: not verified.
Which is cheaper?
We could not compare a like-for-like listing; price tiers are mid (Licensed Peptides) and budget (Receptor Chem).